DBMS Boyce Codd normal form (BCNF)
It is an advance version of 3NF that’s why it is also referred as 3.5NF. BCNF is stricter than 3NF. A table complies with BCNF if it is in 3NF and for every functional dependency X->Y, X should be the super key of the table.
Example
Suppose there is a company wherein employees work in more than one department. They store the data like this:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7782/a778213fcabc13cd5ba2562c07b0d6a3cf2a49eb" alt="normalization"
Functional dependencies in the table above:
emp_id -> emp_nationality
emp_dept -> {dept_type, dept_no_of_emp}
Candidate key: {emp_id, emp_dept}
The table is not in BCNF as neither emp_id nor emp_dept alone are keys.
To make the table comply with BCNF we can break the table in three tables like this:
emp_nationality table:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d742c/d742c418ac45e5de9fbce43c463a77c624e23e8e" alt="normalization"
emp_nationality table:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddb58/ddb58a1bce8f56d91ac867559731d3a5fa078b9b" alt="normalization"
emp_nationality table:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/464ff/464ff379e392728cc506e4a98266d1ba90b05d3d" alt="normalization"
Functional dependencies:
emp_id -> emp_nationality
emp_dept -> {dept_type, dept_no_of_emp}
Candidate keys:
For first table: emp_id
For second table: emp_dept
For third table: {emp_id, emp_dept}
This is now in BCNF as in both the functional dependencies left side part is a key.
Leave Comment